Respectable Until Proven Otherwise: Women’s Safety and Autonomy

Respectable Until Proven Otherwise: Women’s Safety and Autonomy

Freedom Comes with Conditions

More than a century after women began demanding the right to vote, their freedom remains conditional. Whether walking alone at night, speaking up in meetings, or choosing how to dress, women are still expected to prove their respectability before they’re granted safety or autonomy. The burden of “being careful” hasn’t lifted, it’s simply evolved.

Scrutiny in Public and Private Spaces

Women continue to navigate a world that watches, judges, and disciplines. From social media commentary to workplace microaggressions, their choices are dissected through a lens of suspicion. A woman who asserts herself may be labelled aggressive; one who sets boundaries may be called cold. The scrutiny is relentless, and often internalised.

Consent and Coercion in Modern Disguise

While legal definitions of consent have progressed, cultural norms lag behind. Power imbalances, emotional manipulation, and social pressure still shape many interactions. The “grey zone” of coercion remains familiar territory, especially in industries where women’s bodies are commodified or controlled.

Reproductive Autonomy Under Threat

Access to contraception and abortion has improved, but remains politicised and precarious. In many regions, reproductive rights are subject to shifting legislation, moral panic, and institutional gatekeeping. The fight for bodily autonomy is far from over.

Safety Is Not a Privilege

Safety should be a right, not a reward for compliance. Yet women are still taught to earn it, through silence, modesty, or deference. This conditional protection reinforces inequality and keeps autonomy out of reach. True safety requires structural change, not behavioural policing.